The Milner Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Its time wasting, the first thing the keeper thought about after that went in was "how do i waste some time", instead of worrying about how he completely bottled it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 He wasn't just going to stand there with the ball in his hands though. He probably would have thrown it to one of his own players if Bertrand hadn't been trying to snatch it off him. I would have thought it would have to be a little more prolonged to be considered time wasting.LOL for the save though. Did they say why Hart isn't playing? This guy hasn't ever looked good when I've seen him play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 It looked like it was something he said to Bertrand at the end. The ref booked Bertrand and then Pantillon said something else and you could say the ref say "HEY!", then booked him. Maybe that was just a coincidence timing though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alkaline Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Hart has a back injury apparently, he'll probably miss England's game as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 I did see Hart wasn't pick for England. I thought it was just because Roy was picking a team of mostly inexperienced players. Suppose that makes sense, as it did seem odd he'd been left out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 First look at the 3 new Arsenal players, looking good. 3-0 before half time against Koln, Van Persie on the bench going to play second half apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
framheim Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Ian black called into the Scotland squad. total joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Ian black called into the Scotland squad. total joke.Disgrace. How many games did the guy play for Caley and Hearts without a cap? Soon as he signs for a div 3 team he gets called up. Surely to fuck there's someone playing against SPL or Championship opposition every week who'd be a better pick? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Easy Wishes Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 On the Rodwell deal, I can see what City are doing - he replaces the Hargreaves/Pizarro role from last year in that they need a bit of cover in the midfield - probably seen as a long-term replacement for Gareth Barry and would have arguably cost more than £15m if he had a good season with Everton this season. Furthermore, he is a 'home-grown' Englishman to tick a box in their squad list.The deal also works for Everton because £15m for a team with nae money is a good return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Good business by Everton. Moyes will be itching to spend the £2million of that money that he is given. The rest goes towards re-varnishing the wooden seats at Goodison.They should have just signed Pizzaro on the cheap instead. I've actually not seen Rodwell do much to warrant the pricetag. I think Joe Allen for £15million is much more worthy, as he's shown that he's a good player with alot of technique. City have been linked with Martinez and De Rossi all summer, so I assume Rodwell coming in means those deals are out of the window. Martinez would have been a good buy, as he can also play centre back, and next in line for that position is the woeful Savic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Milner Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Its a strange signing for City, one they dont need him, two they wont play him and three he is made of the same stuff Hargreevs is made of. Weird all round signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paranoid Android Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 But it does mean United won't sign him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 United have been linked with him for years. quite glad nothing ever materialised. Now United can go back to not buying any midfielders ever, because who needs a midfield? Goal stoppers. Goal scorers. That's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Milner Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 United have been linked with him for years. quite glad nothing ever materialised. Now United can go back to not buying any midfielders ever, because who needs a midfield? Valencia, That's it.Fixed for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 That's true, though I included him in goal scorers, because: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TR!ΔNGL€ T€€TH Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Premiership clubs should be forced to adapt the La Liga approach to squad numbers, and have a 1-25 system. Martin Skrtel should not be wearing 37!I know I am not the only one who is bugged by this, maybe we should get a petition going? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 The biggest offender I can think of was when William Gallas, a defender, wore the number 10, an attacking number. UNCOOL.I hate it when first choice keepers don't wear #1. Fuck Joe Hart and Pepe Reina. I bet they've had the choice to have the #1 shirt at some point. Dicks.Bale's not a full back anymore. Get that 3 off him. 11 or die. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 The biggest offender I can think of was when William Gallas, a defender, wore the number 10, an attacking number. UNCOOL.I hate it when first choice keepers don't wear #1. Fuck Joe Hart and Pepe Reina. I bet they've had the choice to have the #1 shirt at some point. Dicks.Bale's not a full back anymore. Get that 3 off him. 11 or die.Bale's been wearing number 9 in pre season. Spuds still only have 1 senior striker as well at the moment, Levy needs to get the finger out a sign someone.It annoys me that Santos wears number 11 as well at full back, it's just madness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Wenger just gives out squad numbers like Christmas cards, the big miserable oik. DISCIPLINE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Wenger just gives out squad numbers like Christmas cards, the big miserable oik. DISCIPLINE!MISERABLE, what are you talking about. He's always out having a larf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Squad numbers are a funny one for me. I think it's cool for a left full-back to wear #11 - cos Spain do that - but I find it totally unacceptable when a right full back sports the #7 (Igancio Abate at the EUROs. Mind you, he's more a "wing-back"). I love a #5 in midfield to. #4 and #6 at CB, 5 in Midfield. Cool. That's how Aberdeen have it now too. Cool.Moreover, Bale still wearing #3? Fuck that shit. Fuck him wearing #9 also, that should never be assigned to anyone other than a striker.I guess I don't really know what I think. Did Boulharouz not wear #9 when he was at Chelsea? That's even worse than Gallas wearing #10.EDIT: Gyan can fuck off with his #3 bollocks too. I think a striker can sport any number from 7-11 (with 8 as an exception, but still acceptable), but no-one other than a striker should ever wear #9. Central midfielders can wear 4, 5, 6, 8 or 10. Never should they wear 7 or 9. It annoys me a bit when wingers wear 10. Scotland always do that. Full-backs should really stick to 2 or 3, but 6 is ok for a LB, coz of Brazil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scootray Posted August 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 I don't care what numbers anyone wears unless it's 01. Wank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Easy Wishes Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 I'm sure there was a comprehensive few pages on squad numbers perhaps in the Season 2011/2012 thread. Love them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squad_number_(association_football) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsinho Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 I'm sure there was a comprehensive few pages on squad numbers perhaps in the Season 2011/2012 thread. Love them.09/10!http://aberdeen-music.com/threads/2009-2010-season-thread.40817/page-75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.