you are right' date=' given the nature of the music industry today there are no shortage of over rated bands in the limelight and competent, unique and novel musos either dissuaded from the entering the industry in the first place or scraping a living in the sidelines.... however zepp?? can't possibly agree with that, technically all very competent musos, artistically pioneering. the simple truth is that several genres were borne out of zep, forget about any individual influences they may have had on other artists.... i think i'm correct in saying one of the most sampled bands to date also.... invariably what is deemed to be an overrated band to one will be ground breaking to another...but to try and avoid the merely subjective...why not justify your inclusion of zepp with some substantial argument....in short, why do u think zepp are overrated? the beatles? agreed, overrated, don't get me wrong a good band, good songs, but the problem here is that so many people in the 50 to 60 age group (mostly cliff fans btw) seriously believe these guys are responsible for all contemporary music there after, from jimi to bucks fizz... the same people who over rate the beatles, imo, have no knowledge of the blues and r&b (real r&b btw) routes from which jimi, zepp and a pile of others emanate from... oasis simply made a living out of plagiarism, so no arguments there..... tbh looking at the point of the originating thread....and the industry today....i'd pose the question...name a mainstream outfit that isn't overrated....