Jeid Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 I had a go on the HD25's.. really good headphones. Wouldn't mind a pair myself for tracking stuff I've got HD555's for checking the low end of my mixes just now. Pretty decent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted September 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 I've been swithering over whether or not to get a MacBook and go that way, but they're just so damn expensive. Having had a look at Reaper, that might be the best option and probably wouldn't require me to buy a new laptop. What would you guys recommend as a good USB audio interface? Something like http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fast-Track-USB-Interface-Software/dp/B002QZ402Q/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1348340409&sr=8-2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alkaline Posted September 22, 2012 Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 I have this and it's very good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Gold Posted September 22, 2012 Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Apogee-ONE-Microphone-Audio-Interface/dp/B002FOEKTGI got one of these based on good reviews. The built-in microphone is surprisingly great, and I really like how compact it is. However, if you own a decent microphone already (I don't) it might be a bit pricey.It also works really well with Garageband if you go the Mac road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOX Posted September 23, 2012 Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 I've been swithering over whether or not to get a MacBook and go that way, but they're just so damn expensive. Having had a look at Reaper, that might be the best option and probably wouldn't require me to buy a new laptop. What would you guys recommend as a good USB audio interface? Something like http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fast-Track-USB-Interface-Software/dp/B002QZ402Q/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1348340409&sr=8-2I use a TASCAM but I can't remember what the model number is of it. Has two mic slot things on it and some midi inputs and that. Is good! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 23, 2012 Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 I use this for everything now:The many tones from the unit itself are wonderful for a solid state practice amp. It responds to my playing like a valve amp would and is just so much fun to play. Then it doubles up as USB interface, where I record over programmed drum tracks in Acoustica Mixcraft, which used to be such a simple piece of software akin to Audacity, but it just keeps getting better and more indepth, whilst still being so easy to use. Then I have the option of recording guitar tracks as they sound from the amp, or running a flat, dry guitar signal into Mixcraft and beefing it up with some Amplitube plugins, or some of Mixcrafts own guitar emulators, which I believe are just as good as the Amplitube stuff. I tend to track 3 guitars usually, and use 2 from the amp, and one dry signal with an Amplitube or Mixcraft model on it. Sounds mighty.Also, if you're wanting to mess about with programmed drums, I highly recommend HYDROGEN, which is a 100% free sequencer, with a ton of downloadable drumkits, and is incredibly tweakable. Being able to randomize the pitch of the percussion hits as well as adding a very subtle off-beat swing means you can make the drums sound incredibly human and less robotic than most sequencers. I've used a few - Drumsite, Beatcraft, FL, and an old Roland drum machine, but Hydrogen kills the lot. Great bit of software. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOX Posted September 23, 2012 Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 Also, if you're wanting to mess about with programmed drums, I highly recommend HYDROGEN, which is a 100% free sequencer, with a ton of downloadable drumkits, and is incredibly tweakable. Being able to randomize the pitch of the percussion hits as well as adding a very subtle off-beat swing means you can make the drums sound incredibly human and less robotic than most sequencers. I've used a few - Drumsite, Beatcraft, FL, and an old Roland drum machine, but Hydrogen kills the lot. Great bit of software.Seconded, just downloaded and looking pretty ace. And free! Yay Linux! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 23, 2012 Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 The default drumkit isn't great however. Check out the library of available "official" kits. There's some great stuff. There's thousands of unofficial ones made by users all over the net too. Some are incredible. There's a really great unofficial "Albini" kit which sounds like the drums on In Utero. The bass drum sounds like being kicked in the head. BOOM BOOM BOOM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOX Posted September 23, 2012 Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 The default drumkit isn't great however. Check out the library of available "official" kits. There's some great stuff. There's thousands of unofficial ones made by users all over the net too. Some are incredible. There's a really great unofficial "Albini" kit which sounds like the drums on In Utero. The bass drum sounds like being kicked in the head. BOOM BOOM BOOM.Default drumkits always suck. I'll hae a wee lookie at the other ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Also, if you're wanting to mess about with programmed drums, I highly recommend HYDROGEN, which is a 100% free sequencer, with a ton of downloadable drumkits, and is incredibly tweakable. I've been after a free pattern based sequencer for ages but not been able to find one. Last time I looked at Hydrogen it was linux only. Cheers for this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Yeah, it's pretty new for Windows. Think it's only been in circulation for about a year, and it's still in a BETA stage, but still 100% useable.The conversion is still buggy at the minute, so if youre using WINDOWS Hydrogen to structure complete songs with lots of different alternating patterns and such, some sage advice when using it is to save reguarly. Like, after every pattern or bar you create. Not often, but now and again, it can freeze, and you'll lose what you haven't saved. The other day, I pieced together a whole 3 minute song, with fills and time changes and everything. It was pretty extensive, buit hadn't saved anywhere iin the process because I'm a dick, so I went to export it as a wav, and it crashed. It seems prone to crashing when you're in the program for a long time, like over an hour. So keep pressing CTRL+S every few minutes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 I recorded all the stuff in my signature using just the Yamaha THR10 for both Guitar and Bass, Hydrogen for drums and Mixcraft to put it all together. The "Shandy" EP sounds the better of the two, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Yeah, I'm chuffed with it. It's not hugely loud though. Some knobheads give it bad reviews online because they tried to use it at band practice. Idiots. As a tabletop home practice amp, it's the best I've heard, and it's just a dream for recording. No dicking about with mic's and stuff. Just straight in. I'm not usually a fan of solid state amp modelling, but they really get as close to valve tones as I can imagine. Worth the extra £90 to get the 10 over the 5, for bass, acoustic and flat inputs and memory presets as well as a more tweakable EQ. The 5 only gives you a tone knob, where as the 10 gives you 3 bands.The only thing it doesn't seem to handle well is Fuzz pedals, but I don't use them much. I can add a Fuzz plugin in Mixcraft if I really want to use Fuzz, so it's all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Yeah, it's pretty new for Windows. Think it's only been in circulation for about a year, and it's still in a BETA stage, but still 100% useable.The conversion is still buggy at the minute, so if youre using WINDOWS Hydrogen to structure complete songs with lots of different alternating patterns and such, some sage advice when using it is to save reguarly. Like, after every pattern or bar you create. Not often, but now and again, it can freeze, and you'll lose what you haven't saved. The other day, I pieced together a whole 3 minute song, with fills and time changes and everything. It was pretty extensive, buit hadn't saved anywhere iin the process because I'm a dick, so I went to export it as a wav, and it crashed. It seems prone to crashing when you're in the program for a long time, like over an hour. So keep pressing CTRL+S every few minutes!Haven't had a chance to play with Hydrogen properly yet (and won't again tonight). Does anyone know if it will output the pattern as midi? Was just thinking I could maybe create a pattern on Hydrogen and then get it to send to my synth to play through it's rhythm voices. The sequence editor on the synth isn't quite as user friendly (one dial to do everything). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Nevermind, I looked on the website. Apparently you can export the midi file and load it into a DAW to play the pattern (I think I should be able to midi-out from Reaper to my miniak). Will be giving that a go at the weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TR!ΔNGL€ T€€TH Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 I downloaded Reaper, got annoyed that I couldn't use it straight away without reading the instructions and loaded up Audacity. I will have another go with it. Definitely need to move on from my 8 track to a DAW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 I downloaded Reaper, got annoyed that I couldn't use it straight away without reading the instructions and loaded up Audacity. I will have another go with it. Definitely need to move on from my 8 track to a DAW.Sound on Sound have a load of articles which can help with Reaper:http://www.soundonsound.com/articles/Reaper.phpThey also did a DAW special which included some great tips on Reaper and general DAW recording (was great for me getting started)http://www.sos-smartguides.com/dpu/The Cockos site has a load of useful material including a user guide:http://www.cockos.com/reaper/userguide.phpAt it's most basic level though to start with you should just need to plug in your interface, load Reaper, double click on an empty space on the left hand side of the screen to add a new track, arm it and then hit record and away you go. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Jerk Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 I couldn't get into Reaper either. My Yamaha amp came with Cubase, and I can't get my head around that either. Mixcraft does the business for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colb Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 I downloaded Reaper, got annoyed that I couldn't use it straight away without reading the instructions and loaded up Audacity. I will have another go with it. Definitely need to move on from my 8 track to a DAW.Geoffrey Francis wrote a really good guide to reaper, you can get it on the reaper front page. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevyrob Posted October 14, 2012 Report Share Posted October 14, 2012 If you use garageband you will need a serious amount of extra plugins to record anything to a decent standard although if its just for rough demos why not. Depends what you want from it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOX Posted October 14, 2012 Report Share Posted October 14, 2012 If you use garageband you will need a serious amount of extra plugins to record anything to a decent standard although if its just for rough demos why not. Depends what you want from itI've managed to record pretty good stuff onto Garageband... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevyrob Posted October 14, 2012 Report Share Posted October 14, 2012 Yup me 2 bud, not as good as logic bud for amateur/semi pro it's nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOX Posted October 14, 2012 Report Share Posted October 14, 2012 Yup me 2 bud, not as good as logic bud for amateur/semi pro it's nice!It's also nowhere near as expensive Value for money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevyrob Posted October 14, 2012 Report Share Posted October 14, 2012 Yeah exactly, I just use some plugins to get the end product half decent. Use ozone mastering tools just to finish recordings off . Also garageband is easy to use if your not a technology type of guy like me lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stroopy121 Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 Retard question time. If I have a mixing desk with (say) 8 XLR inputs and a USB output, does that mean I can multitrack those 8 inputs on 8 different channels in my DAW?xx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.