The 'Amen break' is a total classic, along with the 'funky drummer' and a few others. But I love hearing them used, and developed, in different ways, I don't think there's a problem with that. You could say there are issues with copyright, and that these beats are being 'stolen', but the question is, should G.C. Coleman, Clyde Stubblefield or whoever be eternally rewarded for one drum pattern they came up with years ago? All music is recycled sound. It's an interesting point, whether the true merit of these breaks is in the sound created, or in the way the pattern is played. Why is it always these performances that are used? If it is the rhythmic structure of the break, then why not just create the same pattern on a drum machine? Or if it is the drum sound that matters, which would appear to be the case as it is usually 'cut up' to some extent at least, then maybe the sound engineer should be getting the credit...