Jump to content
aberdeen-music

craig deadenstereo

Members
  • Posts

    536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by craig deadenstereo

  1. Originally posted by chris h:

    Chill! I wasn't sayiong my guitar's better than yours, that'd be crazy! Though it used to be quite good until a succession of my philanthropic friends took turns to set it up, clean it up etc. and fucking broke it (i don't blame you for this, the damage was done long before).

    Anyway, my point was that yamaha's are not as good as gibsons. your guitar is quite good, but it's a total hog to play and doesn't have the same low down dirty sound as a proper SG. That's what i think anyway. Plus, it doesn't stay in tune, which kind of sucks :)

    I wouldn't say my guitar is a hog to play at all. I've yet to find an easier guitar to play. You just can't deal with it's raw power! I have yet to find a guitar that i don't knock out of tune...

    But the point is that Guitarist did a feature comparing a Yamaha SG2000 and a Gibson Les Paul Standard and found the Yamaha to be a better guitar....

    Your idea of a proper SG is your brother's Epiphone SG 300 or whatever they are. I played one of those in a shop the other day. Craig's quick review: Piece of Shit!

    Nooch!

  2. Originally posted by chris h:

    Yamaha SG's are not gibson quality without the price. i don't care how many internet sites you've read that on, it simply isn't true.

    Well, it was Guitarist magazine....

    And I've played a few gibsons and didn't think they were any better than my guitar.

    Anyway, what are you talking about? Your strat is a hunk of shit that rattles and has pickups weaker than your spine, boyo! At least it looks decent after I put that black scratchplate on it.....

    Craig

  3. Look, all this electrocuting yourself bullshit isn't going to happen.

    Just change them yourself. I've done it hundreds of times, no probs.

    All this shipping it to Marshall stuff is a load of crap: it will be expensive and you'll not have your amp for a while.

    Just take the top off, put the new valves and close the top. it will take all of 5 minutes.

    The biasing stuff is bullshit as well, you're not really going to notice a difference, and putting in new valves will not blow up your amp.

    Plus, valves are going to need changed more than once in 10 years for a gigging amp.

    Craig

  4. Changing valves is a simple procedure.

    Don't worry about lethal voltages. Unplug the amp and it'll be okay. You'll only be near the top of the chassis, the bit with the lethal voltages is underneath.

    Take the top or the back of the amp off. Make sure the original valves are cool (i.e not been used in the last half hour). The power valves are the big ones (there should be two that look the same). Take these out. Replace with the ones you bought. They will only fit in one way due to the pins.

    Don't worry about getting quad matched valves as you only need two, a matched pair will be fine. Don't worry about biasing, it's complicated and the amp will work fine without out being done. If you notice the amp sounds a little muddy or something in the future then it can possibly be done.

  5. Originally posted by eat your parents:

    How is it misleading, when I put the date and where it was made? Makes your post pretty pointless. Vintage can also mean "from a particular period" which the pedal is.

    I don't agree. If you were selling a 1969 Les Paul, that would be different.

    But then, it's up to you how you advertise stuff you want to sell, so I'll butt out.

  6. Taking spares: fuses for the amps.

    Plus, at least one spare amp (even if it's a shitty 30W job). It'll work.

    Other rules:

    If sleeping in a moving van, sleep with your legs facing forward. If you crash you'll only break them, not your neck.

    Plus, remember: what goes on tour, stays on tour.

    Not that I've ever toured like, but you know.

    Craig

  7. You know, 1985 isn't exactly "vintage". I have an amp from the 70's, and I wouldn't call that "vintage". I think a more appropriate word is "original". When dealing with guitars and stuff, vintage is generally considered pre-1970.

    Just so you don't mislead anyone.

  8. Maybe you should just replace the speaker in it? Try getting a Celestion G75 or something. Probably cost you about 60 and whould stop all the rattles and shit. Easy to install as well.

    www.watfordvalves.com have good deals. I just bought a Celestion Vintage 30 and got it within two days. Only ended up paying 60. (VAT + Postage are not included on that site's prices) Still cheaper than anywhere else though. Would probabaly be more efficeint and therefore louder.

    The other option is to buy a closed back extension cabinet, a 2x12" or something. But I dunno if your amp allows you to link one up.

    As for Marshalls sounding crap with a pedal, it's operator error, seriously.

    Try the following (probably work with your laney as well):

    Set the amp up to a medium gain sound. Roll the volume knob on your guitar back until you get a clean sound (if it's hissing too much, turn the amp gain down a bit). Set the distortion pedal's level to full and the gain to about 2 or 3. Should sound shit hot

    That's the best way to get a good sound out of a pedal.

    If you want a really mean sound get a Big Muff and turn the tone down.

    And remember, not all Marshalls sound the same.

    Craig

  9. I have a Shredmaster pedal. I'll sell you it if you want. It's not in very good (cosmetic) nick but works fine. Has some Meatallica/AiC stickers etc. Used to be owned by Justin of Risactonia.

    Funnily enough, there is a Fender Stage 80 in our warehouse, so I'm going ot band practice now to try this all out.

  10. Originally posted by Leckie Gilman:

    hang on a minute. i use a 100w combo and your amp is clearly way louder than mine, but yours is a 50w.

    so like how does that work?

    Time to get techinical.

    It's do with the quality of the harmonics in the distortion and your ear's ability to pick them up. A valve produces harmonics that are better related to the frequency curve of your ear, compared to transistors, they're something like 25% more efficient when heard by humans. What this means is that they don't have to work as hard to seem louder. The tranisistor amp has to have more power to produce frequencies you can hear. Does this make sense? I'll try and find something on the net about it later....

    I may be slightly wrong, it might be to do with the amount of distortion and it's relationship to your ear...

    I dont really see the point in spending more money to get louder valves, only to have to spend even more money on an attenuator to quieten them.

    It's do do with the transformers are their effect on the tone. More windings etc. It's all very complicated, and I only know this stuff as theory, not having had lots of amps to try it all out on.

    Craig

×
×
  • Create New...