emz-lou Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 hey maybe it was just me but do any of you guys think gary glitters sentence was way to lenient? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyRATM Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 yep. . way to short.probs cause he had some celebrity status left . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delboy Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 deffo too leniet and he paid the family off which to me is always an admission of guilt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timson Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 definatly and its not as if he hadnt been accused of it before ..........he is sick and twisted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hog Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I do believe that if he was convicted the first time but still even chatted with little girls in bars then he was playing with fire. It is strange how when he was convicted a few years ago he was sorry and remorseful, this time he seems to defiant, strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam 45 Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 What was his sentence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyRATM Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 What was his sentence?i "think" it was somethin stupid like 4 years. . tho i cant remember.the sick fuck should get his nuts chopped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delboy Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 those pictures of him grinning and doing a victory sign i found quite disturbing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delboy Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 he got three years and is to be deported when released.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bluesxman Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 He got 3 years, reckoned to be out in 2. And his 'pay-off' to the families amounted to 1200 bucks each. Why do families accept pay-offs? Same in the Jacko case years ago, strange to me.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyRATM Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 he got three years and is to be deported when released....my mistake. . 3 years. . tho the 2 yr thing is right. . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timson Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 exactly just because they have a bit of money they think they can do what they want and then pay off the familys its sick how would he like it if he was the parent of one of those children he abbused???????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hog Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Actually, he could be out by Xmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MKII Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 It is strange how when he was convicted a few years ago he was sorry and remorseful' date=' this time he seems to defiant, strange.[/quote']He was remorseful before, but for selfish reasons because he knew his life in UK was fucked, now he's just desperate. What will happen when he gets out, chucked back here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyRATM Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Actually' date=' he could be out by Xmas.[/quote']seriously?! fucking hell. . . the law does really protect the guity yet lets the victims rot. . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hog Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 He was remorseful before' date=' but for selfish reasons because he knew his life in UK was fucked, now he's just desperate. What will happen when he gets out, chucked back here?[/quote']Yep, deported back to the UK. He is going to have a hard time back here.....good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MKII Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Is he 'free' here though? He'll be a hunted man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teabags Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 exactly just because they have a bit of money they think they can do what they want and then pay off the familys its sick how would he like it if he was the parent of one of those children he abbused????????the only reason Gary Gliter would ever have kids of his own would be to bum them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaseyBoi Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 there saying he will be released sometime this november.then deported to britian and jailed again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.