Jump to content
aberdeen-music

Music...


Guest Philip

Recommended Posts

Guest Philip

A few weeks back, I had a long think about music, and what it is etc, I came to two rough conclusions here they are:

1) Music in it's most basic form, is the disturbance of silence, but also the use of silence.

2) There is no good or bad music, music simply 'is'. It is the listener that fails to appreciate, or manages to appreciate what he is listening to.

What do you think? Do you have any other definitions of what music is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Philip:

A few weeks back, I had a long think about music, and what it is etc, I came to two rough conclusions here they are:

1) Music in it's most basic form, is the disturbance of silence, but also the use of silence.

2) There is no good or bad music, music simply 'is'. It is the listener that fails to appreciate, or manages to appreciate what he is listening to.

What do you think? Do you have any other definitions of what music is?

I can disturb the silence in a very basic form, doesn't make it music. Back to the drawing board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip

Re: Re: Music...

Originally posted by soundian:

I can disturb the silence in a very basic form, doesn't make it music. Back to the drawing board.

[/quote

But say someone likes the way in which you " disturb the silence in a very basic form"?

Say they hear it as music?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Re: Re: Music...

Originally posted by Philip:
Originally posted by soundian:

I can disturb the silence in a very basic form, doesn't make it music. Back to the drawing board.

[/quote

But say someone likes the way in which you " disturb the silence in a very basic form"?

Say they hear it as music?

So that just boils down to your second point then. Music is only music if the listener perceives it as music.

Which makes all debate on the matter irrelevant if true.

My dictionary says its 'the art of making sound in a rythmically harmonious way' which I think is a better starting point. It implies deliberate actions with some structure.

Dropping a tea cup wouldn't be considered music by any sane person, dropping several tea cups in quick succession may (it would sound like a bad cafe accident to most people though). It's the difference between noise and music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip

Yeah, I think intent would need to be part of it, not sure about structure, but I disagree with the dictionary definition because I dont think music has to be rhythmic or harmonious!

I'm just interested to see what people think music is... defining it appears to be an impossible task though!

I hope this doesn't end up as some big argument thread though, please refrain from personal slagging etc people!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Philip:

2) There is no good or bad music, music simply 'is'. It is the listener that fails to appreciate, or manages to appreciate what he is listening to.

What do you think? Do you have any other definitions of what music is?

I've been trying to get that across for years on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest redmeat
Originally posted by Philip:

A few weeks back, I had a long think about music, and what it is etc, I came to two rough conclusions here they are:

1) Music in it's most basic form, is the disturbance of silence, but also the use of silence.

If you look at John Cage or the fluxus movement, music doesn't even need to be the disturbance of silence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are some things such as "organised sound" where the composers in the 20th century discard pitch rhythem and harmony etc. I personally feel this isn't music, but still it is classed as music. that is definitly just a disturbance of silence! also things like "musique concrete" where natural sounds are recorded them modified ie. cutting re-assembling playing backward adding speed changes etc. I dont really 'like' this but i can appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip

Intent seems to be a key factor, silence could be said to include (natural/unintentional) ambient sound.

How about: Music is the intentional disturbance of silence and also the intentional use of silence/ambient sound!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip
Originally posted by Philip:

2) There is no good or bad music, music simply 'is'. It is the listener that fails to appreciate, or manages to appreciate what he is listening to.

So, it looks like a minimal version of point 2 might be it:

Music simply IS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip

I'm trying to find a definitve definition for music...

Perhaps all sound and silence can be, or is music!?

Perhaps music cannot be defined, it simply is!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simpson's got it.

I think music is a combination of one or more sounds with some format of structure, following some form of beat or showing some of pattern.

:D

PS: I shoudn't have used the word, "argument" :( sorry, Phil. Discussion... I should have used that word. Yes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip
Originally posted by Lester Burnham:

Simpson's got it.

I think music is a combination of one or more sounds with some format of structure, following some form of beat or showing some of pattern.

:D

This doesn't take in to account a lot of stuff that has been called music though!

Why does structure and rhythm have to be involved for it to be called music?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by ghost:

In my opinion,

sound is anything you can hear

music is any combination of one or more sounds.

No. Go back to my teacup analogy. If I dropped several teacups in a row that would be music by your definition. What if I just wanted to smash some teacups, the noise they made was irrelevant to me, that wouldn't be musical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip
Originally posted by soundian:

No. Go back to my teacup analogy. If I dropped several teacups in a row that would be music by your definition. What if I just wanted to smash some teacups, the noise they made was irrelevant to me, that wouldn't be musical.

Perhaps this is accidental or unintentional music!

So the intent behind the smashing of the tea cup would have defined what that sound was, before you smashed it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Philip:

This doesn't take in to account a lot of stuff that has been called music though!

Why does structure and rhythm have to be involved for it to be called music?

Pitch or tone change as an alternative to structure or rhythm could also lump something under the label of, "music".

Which would pretty much bring in every sound known to man...

so yes.... then if that is true... everything is music, regardless of it's origin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Philip

I'm beginning to think that all sound/silence and also the vibration's that are created by sound/silence IS music, but that we are unable or refuse to recognise or acknowledge the fact that this is the case!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...