Webspace can vary a lot - to use two examples. http://www.existentia.net/ < Neil' date=' aberdeen-music.com webmaster's hosting. It's expensive, but you're guaranteed a good service without any bullshit. You're also guaranteed support by someone who knows what they're talking about, rather than some average, poorly trained technical support person. It's worth it for complex needs, anyway. [url']http://www.site5.com < Some random company..it's cheap for what it is, but usually, they make their money elsewhere (no flexibility, etc). I know people with Site5 and they haven't had any major problems, but their technical support and flexibility has been woeful at times. Again, it's worthwhile if you don't have complex needs. With actual site design, again, you pay for what you get. Aaron's posted an example of a cheap website, which may look functional, but when you look at the source, you can see that he's used flash/shockwave to create the buttons - which to me is a huge no-no. But again, it depends on what you want - £15 for a dirt cheap website is fair enough, really, considering that professionals will charge you a fair whack for a site. There should be no need to ever use it - it just provides a sticking point down the line, especially if you can't deliver on it. I wouldn't ever use a reseller that promised unlimited, simply because the chances of them delivering unlimited are very, very unlikely.