Shaki Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 BBC News - Vatican comment on paedophiles draws gay groups' angerAre you fucking kidding me!? Did it go like this: Well to explain, this priest wasnt sexually attracted to children per se, just boysOh, kinda like homosexuals? Well, not exa.Thats great, write it up in a report for me Erm, Yes Your EminenceOr is this the same link that you could make between heterosexuality and the sexual abuse of young girls by men? JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY! What an absolute disgrace. Those fuckers bile my pish something rotten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gladstone Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Just out of interest - are paedophiles attracted to children or is it exclusively boys or exclusively girls? I.e. do you get gay paedophiles and straight paedophiles or just paedophiles?I would have imagined that the reason the majority of the abuse in the above cases is against boys because there are just more boys going about the place than girls?But yeah - the ignorance on display here is remarkable. It's straight out of the dark ages. "Dinna let 'at poof near my bairns" Why the fuck not? Gay men are attracted to men, not kids you fucking morons!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Mac Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Same vatican that are against contraception in places like africa, Same vatican that has been protecting pedophile priests. this adds to this list of stuff that proves that they're an out of date establishment that does more harm than good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 I just noticed this as well and was about to post it in pet hates! This is disgraceful but in no way out of the ordinary for the Vatican. It is so immoral that they are trying to use the downfalls of the catholic church to further berate a minority that they have always opposed and hated. The only link I see between these revelations of paedophilia among priests is between catholocism and paedophilia, not homosexuality. I'm not insinuating that paedophiles are all catholic, its just that in this case the only two things these disgusting bastards are for certain are paedophiles and catholic priests (priests for the most part anyway). How could they possibly have thought these statements would take the blame away from them as an institution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaki Posted April 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Just out of interest - are paedophiles attracted to children or is it exclusively boys or exclusively girls? I.e. do you get gay paedophiles and straight paedophiles or just paedophiles?I would have imagined that the reason the majority of the abuse in the above cases is against boys because there are just more boys going about the place than girls?But yeah - the ignorance on display here is remarkable. It's straight out of the dark ages. "Dinna let 'at poof near my bairns" Why the fuck not? Gay men are attracted to men, not kids you fucking morons!!Yes, they have their preferences as far as I am aware. I understand there is a history of secret gay relationships in the catholic church because homosexuality was seen as less of a sin than carnal relations with a member of the opposite sex which would obviously be against the vows of priests, monks, nuns etc. There's a theory that this extends to the abuse of children. (I probably read this theory in a fictional book so there may not evidence to support it) I'm no expert on the subject and as such would never make a poorly informed and offensive statement on the matter to deflect the failings and the abhorrent misconduct of my employer or religious institution (if I had one). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda Strong Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 richard dawkins and christopher hitchens are attempting to put the pope on trail when he comes to the UK for crimes against humanity. Richard Dawkins calls for Pope to be put on trial | World news | The Guardian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gladstone Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Yes, they have their preferences as far as I am aware. I understand there is a history of secret gay relationships in the catholic church because homosexuality was seen as less of a sin than carnal relations with a member of the opposite sex which would obviously be against the vows of priests, monks, nuns etc. There's a theory that this extends to the abuse of children. (I probably read this theory in a fictional book so there may not evidence to support it) I'm no expert on the subject and as such would never make a poorly informed and offensive statement on the matter to deflect the failings and the abhorrent misconduct of my employer or religious institution (if I had one).I was just thinking actually - if they are trying to blame homosexuality for all of this, and it was inherent homosexuality causing the child abuse, why wouldn't they just shag each other?I always struggle to get my head around why there are so many instances of abuse in the one institution.Is it that paedophiles see working in that institution gives them access to children and opportunity to fulfil their fantasies, or is it something within the institution that drives them to committing abuse, or brings out the abuser from within them?I just find it all a bit weird. Especially when you hear about (and this isn't really directly to do with the Catholic establishment) instances of abuse when there is more than one abuser. Who the fuck brings that up in conversation? "Aye, eh Jim, I was just wondering if you fancy abusing some boys at the weekend?"Seriously - do they just instintively know each other? Gay people talk about "gay-dar" do paedofiles have "pae-dar"?(That sounds like I'm making light of this - I'm really not - I'm genuinely curious (just out of interest I hasten to add!)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teabags Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 I probably read this theory in a fictional bookThe bible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davewarden Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 richard dawkins and christopher hitchens are attempting to put the pope on trail when he comes to the UK for crimes against humanity. Richard Dawkins calls for Pope to be put on trial | World news | The Guardianwas just away to post this.spot on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Stu Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 richard dawkins and christopher hitchens are attempting to put the pope on trail when he comes to the UK for crimes against humanity. Richard Dawkins calls for Pope to be put on trial | World news | The GuardianEx-notable scientist and prominent atheist in tabloid media publicity stunt shocker!It is a shame about the buggery, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Cynic Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 You mean Dawkins and Hitchens are in a relationship? I think that's rather sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Stu Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Anythings possible Which he really wasn't happy about. They have been fair ripping on the church lately though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaki Posted April 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 You mean Dawkins and Hitchens are in a relationship? I think that's rather sweet Yes and I for one fully support their application to adopt Satan as their child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Cynic Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 It could start a trend, I suppose. Deliberately adopting folk from the dark side will be in the Sunday Times list of 'hip' things for rich folk to do.I expect the nappy changing would be worse than usual, but at least they wouldn't have to breast feed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda Strong Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Ex-notable scientist and prominent atheist in tabloid media publicity stunt shocker!It is a shame about the buggery, though.i dunno man, seems to have a bit more thread to it than just a publicity stunt..., guess all we can do is see. i read something similar was put on the cards for a visiting israeli politician who subsequently canceled her trip to the UK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimyReizeger Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 i dunno man, seems to have a bit more thread to it than just a publicity stunt..., Agreed, it highlights the fact that people previously seen as being above the law are utterly subject to it. Of course the Pope won't be arrested, however, such a challenge to an authoritarian power structure can only be a good thing. Publicity stunt yes, but for a positive cause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaki Posted April 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Agreed, it highlights the fact that people previously seen as being above the law are utterly subject to it. Of course the Pope won't be arrested, however, such a challenge to an authoritarian power structure can only be a good thing. Publicity stunt yes, but for a positive cause.Kinda reminiscent of the death of Jade Goody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Stu Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 The ironic aspect to this is that the catholic church take an allegorical view of 'creation' and is therefore not opposed to the scientific theories of our origins that people like Dawkins are advocates for. If only they could reconcile these differences over kiddy fiddling... basically, you either accept that the earth was made by a super-wizard six thousand years ago or you are a small bean regarder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaki Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 The Daily Mash - GAY PRIESTS HAVE SEX WITH MEN, SAY EXPERTS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Stu Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 The Daily Mash - GAY PRIESTS HAVE SEX WITH MEN, SAY EXPERTSChurch historian, Julian Cook, added: "Unfortunately the Vatican has been defeated by it's own logic. If the priests really were gay they would have been defrocked immediately which means the Vatican knew they weren't gay and instead decided to protect them because in their heads being a homosexual is somehow worse than being a paedophile."Still, nice try."That's fucking awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TR!ΔNGL€ T€€TH Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 In other kerrazzy Vatican news:Vatican finally forgives The Beatles over 'bigger than Jesus' comment | News | NME.COMSee, the Vatican can forgive and forget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaki Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 See, the Vatican can forgive and forget.Firstly Paedophiles, then The Beatles, hopefully over the next 100 years they'll forgive homosexuals for being gay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogofish Posted April 16, 2010 Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 Another board has been encouraging members to submit limericks about this. I can't claim credit for any but I think they may need to be spread around:---A heresy known as catholicencouraged altar-boy bumlickwhen they were found outthey were known to shout'Tis the gays and the general public'---There once was a vicar from TringWho talked about God and such thingsBut his real desireWas a boy in the choirWith buttocks like jelly on springs ---There was once a catholic priestWhose pole had never been greasedYou see, His pontif forbidThat unless raping a kidhis sperm was never unleashed.---Is it Muslim or Hindu or JewWho's behind all this hullabaloo?It's not that we're dodgingThe blame for this rogering(But j'accuse homosexuals too!)---A priest broke a sexual tabooAnd it really caused quite a to-doWhen caught fucking kidsHe blamed it on yidsAnd the pooftas and Satan too.---Old Benedict turned a blind eyeAnd shook his wise head with a sigh"Well, men wil be boys"And boys will be toys,"But we all will be saved when we die---Its as if by some Papal decreeCatholic clergymen seem to agreeTheir unhealthy desireFor the boys in the choirMeans the freedom to rape all they see.Course, they dont blame their celibate lifeOr the fact that they dont take a wifeThey prefer blaming gaysFor their own vile waysAnd then cry, Immoralitys rife!Now, the public is quite up in armsFor we know whats abuse, and what harmsBut its nice that the churchHas been left in the lurchAnd defrocked of its fairy-tale charmsYet the Vatican says, Like the JewsWe are held in disdain for our views.With a Nazi in chargeTheres an irony largeWhy not gas yourself, Ratty, and lose?---There's a man who bounces boys on his penisHe'll strum on their rectumWith his knob as a plectrumSaying 'hey it's ok, I'm with Jesus'--- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 I'm all for satirical limericks but, fuck me, the scansion is awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.