Jump to content
aberdeen-music

Which mic?


Bigsby

Recommended Posts

Why is that then, since SM58s are generally found halfway into a singer's mouth in a live environment and SM58s are found on just about everything else?

sm58_large.gif

sm57_large.gif

Science innit.

SM58's are used on stage for vocalists because they generally don't go home blubbing to mummy when the klutz of a singer drops it. When someone decides that they're so angst-ridden that smashing a microphone off the wall/their head/the drummer's head is the only way to relieve the mental torment you won't find an SM58 lying on the floor, it's plastic capsule shattered and it's diaphragm exposed to the world like those weedy 57s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sm58_large.gif

sm57_large.gif

Science innit.

SM58's are used on stage for vocalists because they generally don't go home blubbing to mummy when the klutz of a singer drops it. When someone decides that they're so angst-ridden that smashing a microphone off the wall/their head/the drummer's head is the only way to relieve the mental torment you won't find an SM58 lying on the floor, it's plastic capsule shattered and it's diaphragm exposed to the world like those weedy 57s.

And for the fact that on a 58 the grill covers the rearports, meaning the singer can't cover them with his/her hand like on a 57 making the 57 more of a omni-directional polar pattern resulting in a world of feedback from the monitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the fact that on a 58 the grill covers the rearports, meaning the singer can't cover them with his/her hand like on a 57 making the 57 more of a omni-directional polar pattern resulting in a world of feedback from the monitor.

Covering any part of the grill affects how a 58 works as well. It gets a little 'boxy' when the singers hand is hard up against the base of the grill.

It's certainly a change in the polar pattern that causes feedback but I'm not sure if it's just the frequency response or the actual shape of the pattern itself, most likely both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tam o' Shantie
sm58_large.gif

sm57_large.gif

Science innit.

SM58's are used on stage for vocalists because they generally don't go home blubbing to mummy when the klutz of a singer drops it. When someone decides that they're so angst-ridden that smashing a microphone off the wall/their head/the drummer's head is the only way to relieve the mental torment you won't find an SM58 lying on the floor, it's plastic capsule shattered and it's diaphragm exposed to the world like those weedy 57s.

Whoops, I meant to say 58s in a singer's gob and 57s on everything else (like cabs & snare drums). Which takes me back to my question - why do 57s have a bass roll off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoops, I meant to say 58s in a singer's gob and 57s on everything else (like cabs & snare drums). Which takes me back to my question - why do 57s have a bass roll off?

1) filter out some of the low end mush

2) reduce the effect of mechanical noise

3) reduce the proximity effect when close-miked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tam o' Shantie

...so back to my question - why doesn't the SM58 have low end roll off to counter proximity effect, when it invariably ends up .1mm away from the singer's mouth? Edit...just did a search and both models apparently have an engineered bass roll-off.

Then again, I suppose any mic that has been designed with a frequency response in mind could be described as having an engineered bass roll-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...