Now ,now that is a fair point but..........Distribution and actually getting the bands music to be heard is the biggest problem. It always has been the difference. Funny though if you think about it. Take Sony , record label , dvd and film distributor makers of cassettes and mini discs and cdr's their players and recording hardware. There advertising is telling you that you can record and make your own c.d's. The very small print reminds you that you must own the material. What did they think we would do with the technology? Make our own little mix tapes? Keep them to ourselves? Nah they made a rod for their own back. They bitched about cassettes (ruined album covers with that stupid pirate logo) If it caused them to lose so much money then why do they keep on making the technology better and more available? I download and i buy the album if i like it. I believe the artist should be able to make a living out of his work. Still once the touring costs and the video shoot etc , etc are taken away the poor bastards income is next to nothing. So what to do? I am not going to pay for a computer file of inferior quality. Perhaps the record companies need to be a little more selective concerning the acts they sign. 40 odd albums released a week? You need streaming and downloads to even have a small chance of being able to hear the sheer volume of music that is out there. We love music but it is seen nowadays as a cheap commodity like tesco own brand baked beans. The record companies could save bucks if they stopped the endless re-mastering , expanded , deluxe versions of every album they own. Be like the Rhino label a download could never replace their product.