| | #1 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Fucking retards. Shows how poor some journalism can be. For those not aware, Tom Huddlestone is a slightly chunky tottenham player. I photoshopped him looking a bit fatter and gave him a McDonalds bag in his hand and posted it on a Spurs forum. The daily mail somehow found it, believed it and it ended up on their website with a story! They've subsequently found out it was a wind up and amended their article now saying it's a prank. Tom goes large: No wonder Spurs find it hard to accommodate Huddlestone in their midfield | Mail Online |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | lol! got a copy of the original text? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I'm afraid I don't have it, but basically the original article said stuff like "Tom's been enjoying burgers on the beach", and that "Harry Redknapp might not see the funny side", although at the very bottom of the article they did put a one sentence disclaimer saying words to the effect of 'this is possibly a spoof circulating on fan's forums' . But they still ran the original article as if it was true. Total joke. And like you say teabags, you can tell because they haven't changed the title in the URL! |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
I'm guessing the transformers movie will blow that guys mind. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with a flyer - photoshop! | lola54 | Networking | 5 | 28-10-2009 12:34 |
| Aliens Vs Predator | The Subtle Arts | Gaming & Technology | 16 | 23-10-2009 18:13 |
| BBC's Article on "emo's" in response to a planned "emo" march on the Daily Mail HQ | pastperfect | General Discussion | 28 | 31-05-2008 03:25 |
| Lost Passports (Courtesy of the Royal Mail) | Wax | General Discussion | 52 | 16-11-2006 04:18 |