View Single Post
Old 28-04-2007, 20:52   #6 (permalink)
RF Scott


RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.RF Scott is a name known to all with 236 reputation points.

Profile
Male
location: Stonehaven / Aberdeen
joined: Aug 2003
posts: 2,801

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post
No, i disagree. They should both be treated the same as they are both doing the same thing and should incur the same fees for the performance rights of an artists songs.
Its not really the same though, is it? The way you are looking at it is a bit black and white.

For instance, lets say a child care company operates a number of childcare facilities. It is a money making venture, set up to make money.

Now lets say that there is a community run childcare centre, which is run to provide a service, run by volunteers, non-profit.

Should they be fored to pay the same hypothetical childcare tax system, based on how many children they look after, how frequently, no matter what their income is?

If it wasn't for 'pirate' radio, things would be a lot different, without a doubt.
RF Scott is offline   Reply With Quote